Treasuries Still Not Cracking
fernando quartrtarolo

Treasuries Still Not Cracking

Written by  John Aziz Monday, 16 April 2012
Tyler Durden pointed out yesterday that just three weeks after Goldman made the case for equities relative to bonds, the muppets who had listened to their advice were getting skewered.




I wrote a while back that (unlike some others) I didn’t believe it was likely that  this was going to be a cataclysmic rate spike. Readers who want to detect one need to watch whether sovereign creditors especially Russia and China are selling, and at what pace — the faster the liquidation, the more rates may spike.
 

Of course, I am still convinced that the real fragility to America’s economy isn’t actually a rate spike or inflation.The Fed has a very good handle on both of these things (but not, of course — as is always the case with central planning — on unwanted side effects. They can effectively do QE (and monetise debt) without really inflating the currency much; simply shoot the money to primary dealers for treasuries, and pay the primary dealers interest on excess reserves so that very little of the money gets lent out, thus inflating the currency.
 

Benny the great and wise central planner thinks he has suppressed the volatility. But as I mention above (and as Taleb more eloquently puts it in his forthcoming volume Antifragile) when volatility is artificially suppressed, there are always unwanted side effects. And that — the unwanted side effects, not the widely-reported fears of inflation and rate spikes — I believe, is the true danger.
 

One unwanted side effect could be provoking a damaging and  trade war with China, from which the West imports so much. That is my pet theory, and one I’ve devoted a few thousand words to over the last few months. But the trouble with side-effects is that sometimes it is very hard to tell what the weakest link (i.e. the point that will break) in a volatility-suppressed system is. Tyler Durden reports that systemic financial fragility (as measured by CDS) is at a recent-high, too:

 



Believers in technical analysis (I am quite sceptical) are pointing to a head-and-shoulders top in the “recovery” (to go with the bigger head and shoulders top that is very much one of the stories of the last ten years):

 


I don’t know when the black swans will come home to roost and the strange creature that we call the present global economic order will go ka-put. But I see the fragilities caused by central planners suppressing the system’s natural volatility and order, and I see the growing potential for disastrous side-effects.


This article first appeared in the John Aziz' blog.

John Aziz

John Aziz

John Aziz is a 24 years old writer, college dropout, and ex-trader. 

His subject interests include global macro, black swan theory, sustainability, geopolitics, and the philosophy of economics. 
 

He is on Twitter @azizonomics

Website: azizonomics.com

2 comments

  • Comment Link Peter Tuesday, 17 April 2012 10:45 posted by Peter

    My problem with this type of analysis (and a lot of what comes out of Max Keiser's mouth) is that I don't undertand much of it because of the use of finacial sector trading jargon. I'm sure this goes for many. What does this mean for example: "shoot the money to primary dealers for treasuries, and pay the primary dealers interest on excess reserves". Ive never been a trader but I am looking for some understanding of what is really going on in the financial system, particulalrly as it impacts on the real economy. Please try writing something that a wider audience can get their head around.

  • Comment Link Jim Wednesday, 02 May 2012 21:28 posted by Jim

    "They can effectively do QE (and monetise debt) without really inflating the currency much; simply shoot the money to primary dealers for treasuries, and pay the primary dealers interest on excess reserves so that very little of the money gets lent out, thus inflating the currency."

    That QE'd money gets spent by the US government, though - how is that being 'sterilized' in terms of currency inflation? The PDs aren't paying for it with cash/deposit money, are they?

Login to post comments

Blog & News Menu

Search

Contribute

Citizen Journalism

The many are smarter than the few – we would like to publish your opinion on the site so please send your article here. But remember absolute certainty is the preserve of the deluded.

Fancy contributing?

Youtube

Twitter

Honesty Box



Newsletter Signup

Facebook

Latest News

2013 © Renegade Economist