Speculate, Accumulate and Derail the Economy
Raena Armitage

Speculate, Accumulate and Derail the Economy

Written by  Mark Braund Wednesday, 20 July 2011

Speculative investment is held up as a cornerstone of modern capitalism, but given the way it screws up the economy, I’m surprised it’s still legal.

As a way of securing wealth without engaging in real economic activity – the act of combining land, labour and capital to create something with exchange value in the market place – it’s been around almost as long as land rent. But unlike rent, the gains enjoyed by speculative investors arise not as a side-effect of legitimate economic activity, but as a result of a conscious effort by people with spare cash to subvert the natural workings of the economy. Speculative investment reduces the ability of the economy to meet it’s primary objective: enabling everyone to satisfy their basic needs through a process of mutual exchange.
 

Three broad types of speculation are worth considering here: speculation in land, in tangible commodities, and in the markets for money and other financial instruments.
 

Sit Tight ‘till the Price is Right…

Over time, land values rise because people are willing and able to pay more for the use of land. But speculators don’t generally make use of the land they own; they want it simply because it grows in value. And the act of speculative landholding itself causes land values to rise further. It drives up prices making it harder for people who need land to get access to it: some end up homeless, others unemployed.
 

The same happens with speculative investments in tangible commodities like oil or wheat. Again, speculators have no use for the commodity in question, but they drive up prices for those who do. We all contribute to the unearned wealth of speculators each time we put fuel in our cars. And in poor countries, hungry people pay with their lives when wheat prices are driven up beyond the means of governments to import sufficient to cover the shortfall in domestic production.
 

If I Didn’t Do It Someone Else Would…

But screwing up the land and commodity markets is not enough for the ambitious speculator: speculation in the financial markets promises even greater rewards. Not only can currencies be played off against one another, regardless of the consequences for the citizens of countries so targeted, but there is no limit to the number and nature of financial ‘products’ than are invented, traded, and thus made subject to speculation. Among these are ‘naked’ Credit Default Swaps, whereby investment banks, hedge funds and institutional investors intentionally put themselves in a position to benefit from sovereign debt defaults, like the one about to overwhelm the people of Greece.
 

The Rigged House Never Loses

Financial market speculation has been compared to a casino, but the comparison doesn’t stand up.  In a game of roulette or blackjack, the odds are stacked against the punter; these are games of pure chance. In the financial markets, the game is rigged in favour of speculators, who, through their financial power, are able to influence events so they win every time. The beneficiaries of speculative investment get wealthier, not because they work hard (or at all), but because financial wizards have devised ways for the rich to further enrich themselves at the expense of the rest of us.
 

If you accept speculation as an intrinsic and therefore legitimate part of the economic system it becomes hard to find grounds for regulating it. Given that it serves no useful economic purpose, perhaps it’s time we realised the world would be a better place without it.

Mark Braund

Mark Braund

Mark Braund Is a freelance writer with a specific interest in the prospects for transformative social change towards a more just, inclusive and sustainable society. He also is regular contributor to the Guardian and lives with his family in London

Website: www.markbraund.com

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.




15 comments

  • Comment Link Hmmmmmm Wednesday, 20 July 2011 20:20 posted by Hmmmmmm

    I don't know whether to laugh or cry, but I suppose I should be happy that at least there is one more economist that thinks this (or at least is prepared to say this openly).

    Frankly, the fact that this even makes it to being an article is depressing. As a non-economist who has only a passing interest in finance, everything about the financial system seems to be an incomprehensible joke. It really has been designed to not only take as much from us now as possible, but to take as much of our future wealth as possible too, while all the time printing off a load of money for themselves, how indeed can this be legal?!? The worst bit is that when the easy pickings (from constantly appreciating everything) during a boom comes to an end, as it did in 2008, the fact that they will stop at nothing to keep their revenues coming in, really becomes more visible. Even going as far as destroying their investment if it means short term revenues are maintained. They have ensured they are almost completely insulated from the consequences of those decisions anyway.

    Anyway, this might sound like I'm unhappy (I am), but not at all with your article. We need more people like you and I have only just discovered you, but you seem to be doing some great writing, so keep up the good work! I'm from an engineering background and am horrified by what the bean counters have done to our industry and our country. The sad thing is that the financial "ingenuity" our country is so proud of, is all we have left, and if we lose our standing in this regard, we truly will be finished as a country.

  • Comment Link Alex Thursday, 21 July 2011 14:52 posted by Alex

    Well Mark, you may be right in your unsubstantiated assertions.
    Alternatively, common sense, observed facts and over a century of standard economic theory may be right, and you wrong.
    I know which I would go for.

  • Comment Link Mark Braund Thursday, 21 July 2011 16:18 posted by Mark Braund

    Thanks for your comment Alex, but perhaps it's a century of standard economic theory - theory that generally refuses to put any value on human wellbeing - that has delivered us to this point. Or would you say that the global economy is in pretty good shape at the moment?

    Hmmmm: It is, indeed, of great concern how our politicians have put all their eggs in the financial services basket(case). On the other hand, there are plenty of valid service sector activities through which the UK can and does generate export revenue. But I agree it can't compensate entirely for a manufacturing sector that employs ever fewer people.

  • Comment Link SJH Thursday, 21 July 2011 16:48 posted by SJH

    No Mark- you haven't got a clue.

  • Comment Link Mark Braund Thursday, 21 July 2011 17:45 posted by Mark Braund

    SJH: It's difficult to argue with such an insightful response.

    Here at the Renegade Economist we encourage robust debate, but please engage us in debate. There's a very simple premis for this series of articles: the economy is failing - there are reasons for this - we can work out what those reasons are - then we can set about fixing the system.

<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>

Blog & News Menu

Search

Contribute

Citizen Journalism

The many are smarter than the few – we would like to publish your opinion on the site so please send your article here. But remember absolute certainty is the preserve of the deluded.

Fancy contributing?

Twitter

Honesty Box



Newsletter Signup

Facebook

Latest News

2012 © Renegade Economist