Time for an Upgrade
Michel Meynsbrughen

Time for an Upgrade

Written by  Mark Braund Wednesday, 31 August 2011
While unearned wealth is both a symptom and a driver of economic injustice, the objective of transformative social change is not to soak the rich, but to create an environment in which economic opportunities are more widely distributed among the population.

The recent riots and looting in London and other English cities are symptomatic of deep economic dysfunction. The social fabric is straining under the weight of an economics unable to offer any possibility of a different, better future.  The social contract is under greater pressure than at any time since the 1930s. But there is a crucial difference between the world then and the world today: a transformation in our collective moral aspirations that offers a spark of hope for the future, the kind of spark that in the dark days of the mid-20th century it took a world war, and the horrors of the holocaust, to ignite.
 

A just economy will not emerge from the tired debate between left and right, or endless arguments over whether free markets or state control of the economy deliver the best outcome. Justice requires that we transcend these stale and failed dialectics. Neither the contemporary vision of a free-market economy, nor a state-socialist or Keynes-inspired social democratic model can deliver a just economy; each is too riven by conflicts and compromises to get anywhere close.
 

Nothing short of fundamental reforms to the three pivotal institutions of the modern economy will do. Without substantial changes to the tax system; the financial system and the monetary system, a just economy will remain beyond reach.
 

Foundations of a New Social Contract

While a smaller, less expensive, state is perfectly achievable once everyone is permitted a viable stake in the economy, the state will still have an important function for which it will need to raise revenue through taxation. But it should tax the use of land and natural resources, things that are limited supply, rather than wages and profits. Taxing the output of economic activity discourages entrepreneurship and penalises hard work.
 

Financial markets must be reformed so that their sole purpose becomes the channelling of investment capital to the real, productive economy; activities that create the goods, services and experiences that people need to live decent lives, and the extras that promise the possibility of fulfilment and happiness.
 

Alongside these changes we need a new system of money creation; one that ensures stability in the money supply and that sufficient credit is available to fund every viable new business start up, or sustainable plan for expansion. Money should no longer be created as debt, as this places an unnecessary and counterproductive burden on both business and the economy as a whole.
 

Economic Renaissance for the Majority

These measures would curtail the minority enjoyment of unearned wealth and bring the benefits of a dynamic, opportunity-rich economy within reach of many more people. It’s perhaps not easy to imagine such a future economy, and it’s probably impossible to model the precise impact of these changes in terms that conventional economics demands, but such modelling is not necessary. These reforms would have to be implemented gradually so they can be fine-tuned as their impact becomes evident. And a great deal more research is required, especially into the impact that changes in each of these spheres will have on the other two: the mechanisms of the tax, financial and monetary systems are complex and interdependent.
 

If such changes are to be successfully implemented, they will have to be coordinated internationally. This may seem an impossible goal, but it’s not so very different in scale or complexity to the changes unleashed by the process of economic globalisation over the last thirty or so years; it’s just better motivated.
 

Over to You…

But none of this can happen without the commitment of a critical mass of people. Where that tipping point lies is impossible to know but it is out there. What we need now is the most successful marketing campaign in history. Central to that campaign should be the message that transformative change to economic structures and institutions is possible, and if such change were achieved, the life experience of the vast majority of human beings would be dramatically improved.
 

Next week, in the final article in this series, I shall look at the prospects for this campaign, and at the importance of established democratic structures in the process of revolutionary economic change.
 

"Nothing in the world... not all the armies... is as powerful as an idea whose time has come." Victor Hugo 
Mark Braund

Mark Braund

Mark Braund Is a freelance writer with a specific interest in the prospects for transformative social change towards a more just, inclusive and sustainable society. He also is regular contributor to the Guardian and lives with his family in London

Website: www.markbraund.com

6 comments

  • Comment Link Toronto Airport Car Rental Thursday, 01 September 2011 10:49 posted by Toronto Airport Car Rental

    What causes riots? That's not a question you would expect to have a simple answer. We reall need to dig in deeper. This clearly seems to show that when the food price index rises above a certain threshold, the result is trouble around the world. This isn't rocket science. It stands to reason that people become desperate when food is unobtainable. It's often said that any society is three square meals from anarchy...

  • Comment Link chefdave Thursday, 01 September 2011 18:48 posted by chefdave

    I'm a bit concerned that the Renegade Economist seems to have fallen for the money-as-debt meme. When you get to the nuts and bolts of it there's actually very little with our monetary system, centrally controlled interest rates are wrong of course but money as debt makes perfect sense.

  • Comment Link Ross Ashcroft Saturday, 03 September 2011 15:16 posted by Ross Ashcroft

    ChefDave,

    Two things:
    1) The money as debt 'meme' is on the air at the moment and as an organisation that wants social change we cannot stand aloof from the things that lot's of people hold dear.

    2) We disagree that there is 'very little' wrong with the monetary system. Fractional Reserve Banking and compound interest have not been that helpful have they?

    Debt is not natural - nor is Fiat currency - both are doomed to fail. One fails humanity and the other fails the economy.

  • Comment Link chefdave Saturday, 03 September 2011 19:08 posted by chefdave

    Thanks for your reply Ross but as a firm follower of Fred Harrison and a commited Georgist I have to disagree. After debating online for a number of years now I'm well aware that a lot of people hold monetary reform close to their heart, but that doesn't mean they're right. Millions of people around the world also believe in God for example, but that doesn't stop the whole shebang from being made up!

    In my experience most monetary reformers use their theories to deflect attention away from the more pressing problem; the monopolistion of finite natural resources. They'll talk all day long about honest money, but when it comes to a bit of land tax they'll use every trick in the book protect their sacred V.I.

    I also don't see anything wrong with FRB either, having picked over it many times I actually think that it's a rather brilliant system. There's no time here to go into it in depth however.

  • Comment Link Jayarava Tuesday, 26 June 2012 18:55 posted by Jayarava

    An important source document for any social campaign must be the Lewis Powell Memorandum - one of the most successful campaign documents in history. I read it earlier today. It is remarkable the degree to which it has transformed our world.

    Meanwhile I'm certainly behind the idea of the campaign but wonder what it amounts to in practical terms. I hope to show 4 Horseman in Camb soon. But frankly my friend's eyes glaze over in about 2 minutes when I try to talk to them. They're all Buddhists and treating me like a religious fanatic :-) What to do? Who to talk to? Petitions to sign? Websites to sign up to?

    I'm fairly new to this. Which politicians are even interested in these ideas? Clearly no one currently in the cabinet. Since it will take a majority in parliament to change the rules do we concentrate on one party? My MP is a LibDem back bencher. I'm going to see him, but he's toast. Probably Labour will come back.

    Enjoying the Survival Manual so far. (Chp 3)

<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>
Login to post comments

Blog & News Menu

Search

Contribute

Citizen Journalism

The many are smarter than the few – we would like to publish your opinion on the site so please send your article here. But remember absolute certainty is the preserve of the deluded.

Fancy contributing?

Youtube

Twitter

Honesty Box



Newsletter Signup

Facebook

Latest News

2013 © Renegade Economist