Pop the corks chaps – Dave has done it!

Pop the corks chaps – Dave has done it!

Written by  Ross Ashcroft Monday, 12 December 2011

With right wing jingoism, heroic acts and a whiff of British nostalgia who needs strategy? 

In combat the three things most likely to get you killed are bombs, bullets and egos. Today - as wars are economic - we continue to endure a barrage of financial missiles and generally hold our own. But in the middle of this conflict a certain heroic General has compromised the British by making an egotistical decision that will have brutal consequences for more than a generation.
 

David Cameron - Prime Minister of the City of London – is clearly concerned with his legacy and by using his veto he did what was expected of him: he defended City interests. Only he didn’t – he compromised them massively. 
 

Own Goal

Over the last 30 years the City of London has become unsustainably dominant.  Without understanding that Britain has had peak financial services Cameron resorted to the neo-conservative mantra: finance is good, big finance is better and unregulated finance is best. Why? Because his self-interested city chums told him so and the insular / polarising Tory party revel in big divisive decisions that please their sponsors. Cue the guffawing laughs and backslapping.
 

But here’s the thing: Cameron did not get the protocol needed to exempt the UK from European regulation of financial services – so why the celebration? When the hangover clears Tory Eurosceptics will begin to understand that their man has shot himself (and them) in the foot. In future trying to get powers back from Brussels or influencing regulation will be impossible.
 

Nostalgic Island Monkeys

Cameron’s attempt to be Thatcher in drag is embarrassing. The only thing his veto has achieved is to ensure that Britain is sitting safely in Westminster when key European decisions are made – decisions that will affect Britain whether you like it or not. British influence over negotiations that are vital to this country's future is now none existent. This is crazy given that our export market opportunities have now been drastically limited as has our global standing. Make no mistake China and the US want to do business with Europe not a bunch of nostalgic island monkeys who are suspicious of Johnny Foreigner.
 

The further irony is that if we want decent advice as to how to organise the national finances we should turn to Germany not the short sighted bonus seeking city spivs who still think land speculation is the way forward. The indoctrinated Tory party have not yet understood that the human mind is like a parachute – it works so much better when it’s open.
 

When you read the centre right newspaper comments you begin to understand that in the UK the  problem is endemic. The naive bourgeois bang on about Cameron's plucky magnificence. Little do they know that, for him, politics is not about strategy in the pursuit British liberty - it’s merely the same game of ever diminishing returns that his predecessors played. Nostalgia stops them seeing that he’s just set the course for a logical yet tragic British conclusion.
 

No way back…

This petulant isolation will be far from splendid. Europhobes hate the EU because it seeks to defend workers' rights and temper the worst excesses of the “free market”. At a time when neo-liberal lunatics are blindly welcoming economic policy dictated by despotic Goldman Sachs and defunct credit rating agencies Britain needs a voice at the European table. Or am I being too alarmist? Will ‘brave’ Dave also veto those dirty rotters?
 

What’s done is done - the most crucial foreign policy decision in decades that many will come to regret. This tribal stance has cast this little island adrift and will ultimately backfire. Repairing the rift with Europe may well prove impossible.
 

Without a well functioning economic base every democracy is temporary which makes ‘democratic’ politics a magnet for narcissists. Unfortunately narcissists desire for heroic acts means they often shy away from the patient decisions that are best for the national interest. By trying to build a legacy Mr Cameron has not bucked the trend. 

Ross Ashcroft

Ross Ashcroft

Filmmaker / Entrepreneur / Co-Founder of The Motherlode Studio / Renegade Economist

Website: www.motherlode.org.uk

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.




19 comments

  • Comment Link Blobster Wednesday, 14 December 2011 13:45 posted by Blobster

    Ross, your reply to my posting yesterday was appreciated and I was somewhat flippant in the comments about you and your mates drinking in wine bars.

    Nevertheless, there does seem a disconnect between academics and a large proportion of the population. Maybe you are too young to remember Britain's exit from the Exchange Rate Mechanism in 1992. Many working class people remember it only too well: they lost their jobs during the two years we were subject to an artificial exchange rate.

    Unfortunately, ERM on steroids is what the Euro is. Surely you are not recommending it?

    I run a small antiques business. Thanks to the internet, we have overseas customers. One third of the goods we sell is exported. Apart from not having to complete a customs form when sending merchandise to Europe, I see no other benefit for my business being in the European Union. Even the euro is of no assistance. Customers pay by bank transfer and we receive remittance in sterling. UK businesses have lived with exchange rate movements for centuries - it's swings and roundabouts.

    The Renegade Economist continues to bang on about taxing land and consumption instead of production. This sounds good in theory, but please explain what this would mean to the average family who own their own house and, therefore, the land it is built on. Tell us how much tax you reckon they would pay per annum.

    It sounds like a potentially regressive tax to me and one that could force elderly or low income occupants to sell their homes.

    Surely, punters owning their own house and land is something to aspire to and not to tax? Property ownership goes bad when there's speculation. In Britain's case this can be reversed by:

    1) Ensuring that mortgages are granted to only those who can repay them. In the 1970's we didn't simply fill out a form and lied about out income, we had to be seen by a building society manager.

    2) Scrap housing benefits. This was intended to help the poor but now lines landlords' pockets and encourages speculation on buy-to-lets.

    3) Raise interest rates to a market level. Sure, some feckless people will go bust and lose their homes. However, in the long run house prices will become much cheaper and price discovery will return to the housing market.

  • Comment Link Ross Ashcroft Friday, 16 December 2011 23:31 posted by Ross Ashcroft

    Blobster,

    I can't flesh out all the benefits about reforming the tax system here. But we will do it in the book that accompanies the Four Horsemen. This is not a shameless plug it's just more practical to do it once and do it well.

    As a business owner it is important to remove income tax and VAT so you can create jobs and growth. The best way to do this is shift the tax take to the location someone chooses to occupy.

    Ponder this - what value doe the Duke of Westminster add in comparison to say James Dyson? Who would you rather tax and who would you encourage to keep innovating?

    Scrapping benefits is a good idea as long as you allow people to make a living - that is not the case with our current tax set-up. The productive are punished and the parasitical are praised.

    Sorry not to be more expansive it's a time and space issue.

  • Comment Link andy sk Sunday, 25 December 2011 20:50 posted by andy sk

    Europe may once have sought to protect workers rights and protect from the worst excesses of the 'free market' but not in its present incarnation. Yes 'Dave' refused to sign up in order to protect the spivvery in the City, but signed up for this agreement would enforce austerity on the public as a matter of law.

    You might or might not think much of the the economic plans of the official opposition, but this plan would have made it illegal. That is a matter for the electorate to decide, not the EU.

  • Comment Link Melton24Mary Monday, 26 December 2011 03:56 posted by Melton24Mary

    Buildings are not cheap and not everybody can buy it. Nevertheless, business loans are invented to support different people in such kind of hard situations.

<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 Next > End >>

Blog & News Menu

Search

Contribute

Citizen Journalism

The many are smarter than the few – we would like to publish your opinion on the site so please send your article here. But remember absolute certainty is the preserve of the deluded.

Fancy contributing?

Youtube

Twitter

Honesty Box



Newsletter Signup

Facebook

Latest News

2012 © Renegade Economist